Showing posts with label Human-rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human-rights. Show all posts

Monday, 5 December 2016

Come to International Human Rights Day Celebrations - Free of Charge - Register Today


OR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 23, 2016

2016 Human Rights Award Recipients Announced

The Manitoba Association for Rights and Liberties, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Manitoba Human Rights Commission have just announced the recipient of the 2016 awards.   These awards are given out every year in celebration of International Human Rights Day.  

 

Human Rights Commitment Award: The 2016 recipient is Tracia’s Trust- Manitoba’s Strategy to Combat Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking.  The members of this team will be accepting the award. 

 

Tracia’s Trust, named in honour of Tracia Owen who died tragically at the age of 14, is Manitoba’s strategy responding to children and youth at risk of/or survivors of sexual exploitation and human trafficking.  These unsung heroes of this made-in-Manitoba strategy team are worthy of the Human Rights Commitment Award of Manitoba. Their daily, collaborative determination and dedication to protecting and working with our most vulnerable embodies what human rights work is all about.

 

The Human Rights Commitment Award recognizes those who have promoted respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and have advanced the rights of Manitobans.  The award itself is piece of art, designed this year by Brandon artist, Chris Cooper. 

 

In addition, the Award Selection Committee selected two nominations for an Honourable Mention: Ms Janet Baldwin and Dr. Joseph Kaufert.  Both are currently volunteers at Winnipeg Harvest and have demonstrated a lifelong commitment to human rights.

 

Sybil Shack Human Rights Youth Award: The 2016 recipient is Ms Lauren Milne.  She is a law student from Manitoba currently studying at the University of North Dakota.

 

Lauren wrote “The Gender Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure: An Analysis of Strengths and Limitations in the Context of South Africa” which was published in 2014 in Undercurrent: a Canadian Journal for International Development Studies.

 

In addition, Lauren traveled to “The Projects Abroad Human Rights Office” in Cape Town, South Africa to further her academic and social awareness studies. Her volunteer activities include, Immigrant Refugee Community of Manitoba, the Institute for International Women’s Rights Organization, Canadian Women for Women in Afghanistan and the Legal Help Centre.

 

The Sybil Shack Human Rights Youth Award recognizes the work of a person or group of people, 25 years old and under, that has had an impact on the advancement of human rights as guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and human rights legislation in Manitoba.  

 

The sponsoring partners encourage the public to meet the recipients and join in celebrating the achievements of these remarkable Manitobans. 

 

The Awards will be presented at a reception at the RBC Convention Centre, on Wednesday December 8, from 5:00 pm until 7:00 pm.  This event is free but you must register to attend.  Light refreshments will be served.  To register please visit https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/2016-human-rights-awards-tickets-29629752387 or www.manitobahumanrights.ca and click on Register Here.

 

For further Information or to set up interviews with the recipients, please contact

George Sarides

Assistant Director

Manitoba Human Rights Commission

204 945 5815

Sunday, 31 August 2014

Employers who ask for Canadian Experience may be violating your Human Rights

When employers ask newcomers whether they have Canadian experience that presents a barrier to gainful employment for newcomers, many of whom arrive here highly skilled and qualified. The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) ruled this practice is discrimination  

 The OHRC found that many newcomers turn to unpaid work such as volunteering, internships or low-skilled "survival jobs" to meet the requirement for Canadian experience. They also face obstacles when trying to get professional accreditation since some regulatory bodies will not admit new members without prior work experience in Canada. As a result, they end up in jobs that do not correspond to their education, skills and experience.

The new policy sets out the OHRC's position that a strict requirement for "Canadian experience" is discriminatory, and can only be used in rare circumstances. Employers and regulatory bodies need to ask about all of a job applicant's previous work - where they got their experience does not matter. The policy also tells employers and regulatory bodies how to develop practices, policies and programs that do not result in discrimination.



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/new-to-canada/Remove-Canadian-experience-barrier-Ontario-Human-Rights-Commission/articleshow/41280528.cms

Monday, 20 January 2014

Reilgious Accommodation in the University offends Women

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/01/13/york_universitys_religious_accommodation_decision_the_correct_one_dean_writes.html
The York University dean who approved a student’s request to be removed from a group project with women now has “sincere regret” over the controversy, but stands by his decision. In a letter emailed to university colleagues on Jan. 10, 2014, dean of arts Martin Singer said he saw no other option but to approve a controversial request, made on religious grounds, by a student who wanted to avoid a group seminar with women.
In a letter emailed to university colleagues, dean of arts Martin Singer said he saw no other option but to approve the request, made on religious grounds. “I want to assure each of you of my unwavering commitment to gender equity and of my sincere regret that, given the specific circumstances of this request for accommodation, I was obliged to conclude that the student’s request had to be accommodated,” Singer wrote in an email sent Friday. “I wish I had had another choice, but neither I, nor those who advised me, believe that I did.”
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/01/18/accommodation_issue_shows_human_rights_principles_are_working.html

Monday, 6 January 2014

Training Opportunity - Education

Improve your skills Amnesty International is offering a 5 week human rights advocacy series in conjunction with Global College. Amnesty International Group 19 presents: Outrage to Action Human Rights Advocacy Series Thursday Evenings, 6:00 - 8:30 pm January 23 to February 27, 2014 (no session on February 20) 15 spots available for community members FREE of charge This series is being provided in co-operation with Global College at the University of Winnipeg. Interactive workshops and action challenges will provide knowledge and strategies for addressing current human rights topics. Participants will build awareness, confidence and acquire the tools to effectively engage in human rights campaigns. This series will link participants to Amnesty International’s priority campaigns and other human rights organizations working on related issues. Topics will include women’s rights, Indigenous rights, and business & human rights. Participants will be joined by university students who have registered for this course on a credit basis. If you are interested in attending Outrage to Action, contact Louise at l.simbandumwe@uwinnipeg.ca for an application form. Space is limited so submit your application as soon as possible.

Monday, 18 March 2013

Protecting land, protecting people
From Guyana to Vancouver, Janette Bulkan has built  a career on protecting indigenous land rights and access  to resources.
Her involvement with social issues in forestry began after she noticed more and more chainsaws in indigenous communities in her homeland of Guyana. The men from  these communities were getting into logging.
According to Bulkan, the assumption was that any illegal logging in the country was the work of small-scale, local forestry operations. But after visiting forest sites and documenting practices around the country, she saw that it was the large-scale operations that were not adhering  to guidelines and policies.
“Many of these operations were owned by transnational corporations which held, or illegally rented, logging concessions,” she says.
A new UBC faculty member, Bulkan investigated the slippages between national policies, and government and private sector practices, in forestry in Guyana for her PhD research, which began in 2003 at Yale University. She also worked with indigenous groups to document how these large companies were violating well-established forestry guidelines, land claims and human rights.
http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/2013/03/06/protecting-land-protecting-people/

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Filipino Women victorious in Discrimination lawsuit

http://newamericamedia.org/2012/09/fil-am-hospital-staff-in-ca-win-historic-discrimination-settlement.php
LOS ANGELES – The Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC), a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice, and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced on September 17 a landmark settlement of $975,000 against Delano Regional Medical Center (DRMC), a hospital in California’s Central Valley.

The case was brought forward, on behalf of almost 70 Filipino-American employees who fell victim to discrimination and harassment when hospital administration singled the ethnic group out for enforcement of its English-only policy.

Roots of harassment

In a statement to the Asian Journal, APALC Staff Attorney Carmina Ocampo explained that in 2006, Fil-Am hospital employees alleged that they were harassed and singled out and treated differently from other workers with different ethnicity.

They claimed that the harassment incidents all began when CEO of the hospital called for a mandatory meeting for only Fil-Am staff. During the meeting, the management of the hospital instructed the said employees to speak only in English, allegedly threatening them with suspension or termination for violating the policy.

Ocampo went on to explain that the CEO even went as far as to “threaten with monitoring using surveillance equipment.” And despite the diversity of the hospital’s workforce (with others speaking other languages like Spanish and Hindi) not other ethnic group was told to join this meeting, nor was the language policy enforced upon any other ethnic group.

EEOC General Counsel P. David Lopez, in a statement, said: “Employees should never be targeted because of their national origin or language. The EEOC stands ready to assist employees nationwide who believe they have suffered workplace discrimination, and to ensure that our work force reflects the rich diversity of our nation.”

In a report from the Associated Press (AP), the medical center defended its English-only policy as essential to patient care. In a written statement, officials said the hospital did nothing wrong, said AP.

An e-mail to the Delano Regional Medical Center from Asian Journal was not returned, as of press time.

A harsh workplace dynamic

The meeting resulted in a changed social dynamic within the hospital wherein Filipinos were mocked, harassed, and taunted. In their lawsuit against the DRMC, the Fil-Am employees claimed that the “discriminatory” enforcement of the policy created a hostile work environment for Filipino workers, who were monitored and reprimanded by their colleagues in the hospital. They were often told to speak in English, were ridiculed for their accents, and were humiliated in front of fellow hospital employees.

Under the language policy, Fil-Am employees of DRMC were required to communicate in English at all times at the workplace, even in break rooms, nurses’ stations, and hallways. Even during times when Filipinos were speaking in English, DRMC staff would still remind them to speak in English, especially if they were with other Filipinos.

For months, according to Ocampo, Filipinos were constant targets of reprimands and ridicule, with DRMC staff giving them reproach even without any violation of the English-only rule. One Filipino nurse even claimed that a co-worker sprayed air freshener on her food because the said co-worker apparently did not like the smell of Filipino food.

Another example of harassment is when Fil-Ams were reminded to speak in English even when they were just greeting their fellow co-workers in Tagalog, using the word “Manang” or “Manong,” terms that connote respect in Filipino culture. The Pinoys were constantly reminded to speak in English, even in the cafeterias when they were just having lunch.

Allegedly, the DRMC did not make adequate measures to prevent the harassment that the Filipinos experienced during this time. Even after over a hundred Filipino employees, including Filipino doctors, made formal a complaint about this discrimination, DRMC management still failed to make a significant response on the matter.

According to Ocampo, DRMC did not target the non-Filipino population of the medical center with their strict enforcement of the language policy. The overly harsh and restrictive measure seemed to apply only to the Filipinos.

“We believe DRMC enforced an overly restrictive English only policy against its Filipino American employees and created a workplace environment that was hostile toward them,” said Laboni Hoq, APALC Director for Litigation.

“This settlement will send a strong message to employers that it is illegal to target workers based on their national origin and will hopefully encourage more Asian American and immigrant workers to speak out when their rights are violated, like our brave clients did,” Hoq added.

A harrowing experience


Wilma Lamug, one of the victims of this discrimination, claimed that she felt even more harassed after the first meeting held with the DRMC management.

“I felt more harassed because we Filipinos received constantly harassing words like ‘Shhh, speak English!,’” Lamug confessed.

Another victim, Elnora Cayme, said that during the time of the harassment, at least once or twice a day, a supervisor or co-worker would call her out even at the hallways and break rooms, and say “English only!” According to Cayme, even the housekeeping supervisors and security guards were in on the harassment bit. When she asked a security guard why they were acting in such a way, the guard simply explained that their respective supervisors instructed them to “watch you guys and make sure that you were all speaking English.”

Like most of the Pinoys in the medical center, Lamug was scared for her source of livelihood, as the job she had with the DRMC was her “bread and butter.” And she felt like they “were in trouble.”

Cayme pointed out that DRMC’s actions created tensions among the employees “that weren’t there before.”

“I felt sad, undervalued, and humiliated,” Cayme added.

A huge victory indeed

According to Ocampo, this is the largest settlement for a workplace language discrimination case in the West Coast, and the largest settlement for a workplace language discrimination case in the health care industry in the US. Also, Ocampo added that it is the largest language rights settlement ever secured by the APALC.

“This landmark settlement is a victory for the Asian American and Filipino American communities,” Ocampo said.

“People don’t normally think of Asian Americans when they think of victims of workplace discrimination and harassment,” Ocampo explained.

She went on to elaborate that there are few reports from Asian Americans of cases of harassment, not because they are not victims of this on a more often basis, but rather because they are afraid of the retaliation and backlash that may ensue after such complaints are made. Ocampo also claims that there is a prevailing stereotype that Asian Americans don’t like to complain about violations against them.

“This landmark settlement won by almost 70 Filipino American workers is a powerful example of Asian Americans standing up for their rights and fighting back against discrimination,” Ocampo added.

Aside from the monetary relief, the settlement mandates upon the DRMC a three-year Consent Decree. Under the decree, hospital management is prohibited from engaging in the kind of alleged discrimination and harassment that gave rise to the lawsuit. It also institutes a new Language Policy that “acknowledges the value of the hospital’s diverse work force and allows employees the dignity to speak the language of their choice in appropriate circumstances.”

Furthermore, the Consent Decree will also require the DRMC to hire a third-party Equal Employment Opportunity monitor to “ensure compliance with its terms,” as well as “train all staff to comply with equal employment laws and the new Language Policy.”

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Day in History

Supreme Court of Canada upholds Robert Latimer's 10-year sentence for murdering his daughter who had severe disabilities.

Robert Latimer believed he was doing something good for his daughter as she was in constant pain and he could not fix it. After much soul-searching Latimer took matters into his own hands and ended his daughter's life on October 24th 1993.

Source: Steps in the Rights direction 365 Human Rights celebrations & tragedies that inspired Canada and the world. by Stephen Hammond.